Ines Piot

528 citations
4 papers · 133 · h-index 4

Impact in

  • Neurology top 10%
    • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
    • Neurological disorders and treatments
    • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
    • Neurological diseases and metabolism
    • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
    • Voice and Speech Disorders

Papers in

    • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 4
    • Neurological disorders and treatments 3
    • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders 1
    • Dysphagia Assessment and Management 1

Ines Piot

4 papers receiving 132 citations

Peers

Ines Piot
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Neurology 115
  • Neurology 19
  • Physiology 42
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 25
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 27
Replace John C. van Swieten with:
John C. van Swieten Netherlands
Branislav Veselý Slovakia
Cèlia Painous Spain
Henrike Hanßen Germany
E. Fincati Italy
Miguel A. Labrador‐Espinosa Spain
Lluís Planellás Spain
Alyssa Reimer United States
Kyung Ah Woo South Korea
Clare Johnston United Kingdom
Ines Piot relative to John C. van Swieten Netherlands John C. van Swieten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
John C. van Swieten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Piot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Piot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Piot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Piot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Piot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Piot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Piot. The network helps show where Ines Piot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Piot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Piot Line = papers co-authored together Ines Piot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
#Work
1 201945
2 202038
3 202026
4 202024

About Ines Piot

Ines Piot is a scholar working on Neurology, Speech and Hearing, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 4 papers that have together received 133 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (115 citations), Neurology (19 citations), Physiology (42 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (25 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (27 citations). Ines Piot has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Günter U. Höglinger, Gesine Respondek, Wassilios G. Meissner, Thomas Arzberger, Alex Rajput, María Stamelou, Leslie W. Ferguson, Ellen Gelpí, John C. van Swieten and David J. Irwin. Their work appears in journals such as Movement Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact