Ina Schaefer

1.4k citations
35 papers · 692 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ina Schaefer

35 papers receiving 680 citations

Peers

Ina Schaefer
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 481
  • Insect Science 195
  • Ecology 241
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 100
  • Genetics 145
Replace R. G. Booth with:
R. G. Booth United Kingdom
Rafael Jordana Spain
Gerd Weigmann Germany
Viki Vandomme Belgium
Marzena Stańska Poland
Isamu Okochi Japan
Bernhard Eitzinger Germany
Bernhard Klausnitzer Germany
Giulia Magoga Italy
Gergely Várkonyi Finland
Ina Schaefer relative to R. G. Booth United Kingdom R. G. Booth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.5×
R. G. Booth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ina Schaefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ina Schaefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ina Schaefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ina Schaefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ina Schaefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ina Schaefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ina Schaefer. The network helps show where Ina Schaefer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ina Schaefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ina Schaefer Line = papers co-authored together Ina Schaefer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201082
2 200551
3 201548
4 202245
5 201739
6 201936
7 201234
8 202127
9 201926
10 201723
11 201620
12 201820
13 201220
14 202119
15 201619
16 202119
17 201819
18 202215
19 202015
20 201415

About Ina Schaefer

Ina Schaefer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Insect Science, Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 35 papers that have together received 692 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Study of Mite Species (22 papers), Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology (10 papers), Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies (8 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers) and Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (481 citations), Insect Science (195 citations), Ecology (241 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (100 citations) and Genetics (145 citations). Ina Schaefer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Kazakhstan and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Scheu, Mark Maraun, Roy A. Norton, Tancredi Caruso, Tanja Schwander, Jens Bast, Ting‐Wen Chen, Katja Domes, Aidan M. Keith and Nico Eisenhauer. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology and Evolution, Experimental and Applied Acarology, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Biological Invasions and PeerJ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact