Imre Kovách

784 citations
55 papers · 577 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Imre Kovách

41 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers

Imre Kovách
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 244
  • Urban Studies 88
  • Geography, Planning and Development 77
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 34
  • Political Science and International Relations 95
Replace Marek Furmankiewicz with:
Marek Furmankiewicz Poland
Marit Rosol Germany
Jane Atterton United Kingdom
Francesca Governa Italy
I.J. Terluin Netherlands
Annette Aagaard Thuesen Denmark
Pieter Van den Broeck Belgium
Gusztáv Nemes Hungary
Thomas Purcell United Kingdom
Lawrence Kitchen United Kingdom
Imre Kovách relative to Marek Furmankiewicz Poland Marek Furmankiewicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Marek Furmankiewicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Imre Kovách

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Imre Kovách's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Imre Kovách with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Imre Kovách more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Imre Kovách

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Imre Kovách. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Imre Kovách. The network helps show where Imre Kovách may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Imre Kovách, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Imre Kovách Line = papers co-authored together Imre Kovách links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200690
2 200071
3 200950
4 202136
5 200835
6 202232
7 202027
8
Evaluating the European Approach to Rural Development: Grass-roots Experiences of the LEADER Programme
201525
9 201824
10 202024
11 201623
12 202119
13 199417
14 202211
15 202210
16 20239
17 20098
18 20206
19 20216
20 20194

About Imre Kovách

Imre Kovách is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Urban Studies, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Philosophy, having authored 55 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies (22 papers), Rural development and sustainability (20 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (4 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (3 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (3 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (3 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (3 papers) and Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (244 citations), Urban Studies (88 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (77 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (34 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (95 citations). Imre Kovách has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Czechia and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include Eva Kučerová, Bernadett Csurgó, Boldizsár Gergely Megyesi, Attila Bai, Péter István Balogh, Kjell Andersson, Alex Franklin, Zoltán Gabnai, János Nagy and Zoltán Birkner. Their work appears in journals such as Sociologia Ruralis, Sustainability, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, Agronomy and Rural Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact