I.M. Krämer

1.1k citations
12 papers · 763 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

I.M. Krämer

12 papers receiving 662 citations

Peers

I.M. Krämer
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Language and Linguistics 407
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 302
  • Linguistics and Language 111
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 251
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 256
Replace Theodora Alexopoulou with:
Theodora Alexopoulou United Kingdom
Jennifer Spenader Netherlands
Angeliek van Hout Netherlands
Anna M. Thornton Italy
Galit W. Sassoon Netherlands
Valentine Hacquard United States
Neal Snider United States
Gregory Scontras United States
Andrea Gualmini United States
Tom Roeper United States
I.M. Krämer relative to Theodora Alexopoulou United Kingdom Theodora Alexopoulou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Theodora Alexopoulou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I.M. Krämer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I.M. Krämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.M. Krämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.M. Krämer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I.M. Krämer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.M. Krämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.M. Krämer. The network helps show where I.M. Krämer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside I.M. Krämer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I.M. Krämer Line = papers co-authored together I.M. Krämer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1
Cognitive foundations of interpretation
2007350
2
Semantics and pragmatics: From experiment to theory
2009159
3 200884
4 200665
5 200058
6
Conflicts in Interpretation
201031
7
A large-scale investigation of scalar implicature
20094
8 20103
9 19983
10 20052
11 19992
12 20072

About I.M. Krämer

I.M. Krämer is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Social Psychology and Linguistics and Language, having authored 12 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers), Language Development and Disorders (3 papers), linguistics and terminology studies (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper) and Multilingual Education and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (407 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (302 citations), Linguistics and Language (111 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (251 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (256 citations). I.M. Krämer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joost Zwarts, Helen de Hoop, Petra Hendriks, H.E. de Swart, Jennifer Spenader, John Hoeks, Rineke Verbrugge, Huib E. de Swart and Henriëtte de Swart. Their work appears in journals such as Linguistics in the Netherlands, Journal of Logic Language and Information, Language Acquisition, Lingua and Max Planck Digital Library.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact