Ilza Veith
Impact in
- Archeology top 2%
- General Psychology top 2%
Papers in
-
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies 5
- Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies 4
-
- Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices 6
- Co-authors
- George Rosen (1 shared paper)Chauncey S. Goodrich (1 shared paper)Robert H. Geertsma (7 shared papers)Robert C. Grumet (1 shared paper)Franklin C. McLean (1 shared paper)Erna Lesky (1 shared paper)Nathan Sivin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- JAMA (13 papers)Perspectives in biology and medicine (11 papers)American Journal of Psychiatry (7 papers)The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (6 papers)New England Journal of Medicine (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ilza Veith
80 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Ilza Veith's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
- Archeology 70
- General Psychology 69
- Philosophy 313
- Clinical Psychology 447
- Anthropology 208
Countries citing papers authored by Ilza Veith
This map shows the geographic impact of Ilza Veith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ilza Veith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ilza Veith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ilza Veith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ilza Veith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ilza Veith. The network helps show where Ilza Veith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Ilza Veith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy Hit paper breakdown → | 1964 | 665 |
| 2 | Magic, Faith and Healing. Hit paper breakdown → | 1965 | 273 |
| 3 | 1966 | 272 | |
| 4 | 1964 | 242 | |
| 5 | 1974 | 77 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 60 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 54 | |
| 8 | 1973 | 52 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 40 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 25 | |
| 11 | 1951 | 24 | |
| 12 | 1971 | 22 | |
| 13 | 1971 | 21 | |
| 14 | 1966 | 16 | |
| 15 | 1977 | 16 | |
| 16 | 1967 | 15 | |
| 17 | Acupuncture in traditional Chinese medicine. An historical review. | 1973 | 15 |
| 18 | 1957 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1951 | 12 | |
| 20 | 1973 | 12 |
About Ilza Veith
Ilza Veith is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Clinical Psychology, History, Philosophy and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 100 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (8 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (6 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (5 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (5 papers), Medical History and Research (4 papers), History of Medicine Studies (4 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (4 papers) and Neurology and Historical Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (70 citations), General Psychology (69 citations), Philosophy (313 citations), Clinical Psychology (447 citations) and Anthropology (208 citations). Ilza Veith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include George Rosen, Chauncey S. Goodrich, Robert H. Geertsma, Robert C. Grumet, Franklin C. McLean, Erna Lesky and Nathan Sivin. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Perspectives in biology and medicine, American Journal of Psychiatry, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and New England Journal of Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.