Ian Powell

43 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers

Ian Powell
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Media Technology 62
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 79
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 95
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 140
  • Instrumentation 15
Replace D.E.N. Davies with:
D.E.N. Davies United Kingdom
R. L. Morrison United States
James L. Harris United States
Glen Gillen United States
Zhenhua Li China
Young‐Sik Park South Korea
Bongsoo Lee South Korea
S. Squarcia Italy
J. van der Donk Netherlands
Klaus Witt Germany
Ian Powell relative to D.E.N. Davies United Kingdom D.E.N. Davies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
D.E.N. Davies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Powell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Powell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Powell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Powell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Powell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Powell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Powell. The network helps show where Ian Powell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Powell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Powell Line = papers co-authored together Ian Powell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198191
2 200065
3 200244
4 198742
5 200538
6 199438
7 199829
8 197527
9 200424
10 199619
11 199519
12 199619
13 200619
14 199714
15 199212
16 20068
17 20038
18 20007
19 19867
20
The behaviour of nine-month and two-year olds as assessed by health visitors and parents.
19896

About Ian Powell

Ian Powell is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 48 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced optical system design (11 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (8 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (6 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (6 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (5 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (4 papers), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (3 papers) and Optical Systems and Laser Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (62 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (79 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (95 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (140 citations) and Instrumentation (15 citations). Ian Powell has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ian A. James, Clive Ballard, John T. O’Brien, Pavel Cheben, K. Lowery, Dan‐Xia Xu, Siegfried Janz, Neil Rowlands, R. A. Neville and Joanne C. Zwinkels. Their work appears in journals such as Optical Engineering, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Optics Express, Optical Fiber Technology and International Psychogeriatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact