I. Pow

43 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

I. Pow
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 404
  • Virology 142
  • Parasitology 188
  • Epidemiology 859
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 532
Replace P.-P. Pastoret with:
P.-P. Pastoret Belgium
Kerstin Borchers Germany
Naomi S. Taus United States
J. M. Whalley Australia
J. Brinkhof Netherlands
S. Cavirani Italy
Tomio Matsumura Japan
O.‐R. Kaaden Germany
H. Reid United Kingdom
F.A.M. Rijsewijk Netherlands
I. Pow relative to P.-P. Pastoret Belgium P.-P. Pastoret's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
P.-P. Pastoret · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. Pow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Pow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Pow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Pow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Pow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Pow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Pow. The network helps show where I. Pow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. Pow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. Pow Line = papers co-authored together I. Pow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993224
2 1984176
3 199876
4 198945
5 199743
6 199642
7 199842
8 198442
9 198642
10 198641
11
A cytotoxic T-lymphocyte line propagated from a rabbit infected with sheep associated malignant catarrhal fever.
198337
12 199536
13 198934
14 198334
15 200229
16 198627
17 200322
18 198722
19 199820
20 198419

About I. Pow

I. Pow is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology and Parasitology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (23 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (18 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (18 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (10 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (7 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (7 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (6 papers) and Vector-borne infectious diseases (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (404 citations), Virology (142 citations), Parasitology (188 citations), Epidemiology (859 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (532 citations). I. Pow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include H.W. Reid, D. Buxton, J. Finlayson, H. Reid, Anne Bridgen, Eleanor Berrie, Janice Gilray, P. F. Nettleton, T. Løken and Mona Aleksandersen. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Record, Research in Veterinary Science, Journal of Comparative Pathology, Archives of Virology and Parasitology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact