I. Dolka

63 papers receiving 666 citations

Peers

I. Dolka
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Small Animals 139
  • Animal Science and Zoology 109
  • Microbiology 39
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 203
  • Parasitology 40
Replace Jorge Correia with:
Jorge Correia Portugal
Fernando Constantino‐Casas United Kingdom
Leonardo Leonardi Italy
Elizabeth F. McInnes United Kingdom
T. Matsui Japan
Panayiotis Loukopoulos Greece
Rea‐Min Chu Taiwan
Lee K. Roberts United States
Katia Cappelli Italy
Kerstin Bergvall Sweden
I. Dolka relative to Jorge Correia Portugal Jorge Correia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jorge Correia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. Dolka

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Dolka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Dolka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Dolka more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Dolka

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Dolka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Dolka. The network helps show where I. Dolka may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. Dolka, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. Dolka Line = papers co-authored together I. Dolka links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016109
2 201746
3 201742
4 201128
5 201425
6 201524
7 201224
8 201723
9 201822
10 201620
11 201118
12 201717
13
First case of enterococcal spondylitis in broiler chickens in Poland.
201314
14 201214
15 201814
16 201313
17 201313
18 201313
19 202213
20 201712

About I. Dolka

I. Dolka is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Small Animals, Epidemiology, Animal Science and Zoology and Genetics, having authored 69 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Oncology Research (25 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (12 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (11 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (10 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (7 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (6 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (6 papers) and Coccidia and coccidiosis research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (139 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (109 citations), Microbiology (39 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (203 citations) and Parasitology (40 citations). I. Dolka has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Magdalena Król, R. Sapierzyński, T. Motyl, Artur Żbikowski, P. Szeleszczuk, Beata Dolka, Karol Pawłowski, Kinga Majchrzak, Michał Czopowicz and Joanna Mucha. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Veterinary Research, Journal of Comparative Pathology, Veterinary Research Communications, Scientific Reports and Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact