I. Dolka

63 papers receiving 683 citations

Peers

I. Dolka
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Small Animals 125
  • Animal Science and Zoology 108
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 186
  • Parasitology 41
  • Infectious Diseases 97
Replace Jorge Correia with:
Jorge Correia Portugal
Fernando Constantino‐Casas United Kingdom
Elizabeth F. McInnes United Kingdom
Leonardo Leonardi Italy
T. Matsui Japan
Rea‐Min Chu Taiwan
Katia Cappelli Italy
Barbara Miniscalco Italy
María Elena Turba Italy
Maria E. Lund Australia
I. Dolka relative to Jorge Correia Portugal Jorge Correia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jorge Correia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. Dolka

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Dolka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Dolka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Dolka more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Dolka

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Dolka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Dolka. The network helps show where I. Dolka may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. Dolka, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. Dolka Line = papers co-authored together I. Dolka links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016112
2 201748
3 201743
4 201128
5 201425
6 201525
7 201724
8 201224
9 201824
10 201621
11 201118
12 201817
13 201717
14
First case of enterococcal spondylitis in broiler chickens in Poland.
201314
15 201214
16 202213
17 201313
18 201313
19 201313
20 201712

About I. Dolka

I. Dolka is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Small Animals, Epidemiology, Animal Science and Zoology and Genetics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Oncology Research (22 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (10 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (9 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (8 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (6 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (6 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (5 papers) and Coccidia and coccidiosis research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (125 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (108 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (186 citations), Parasitology (41 citations) and Infectious Diseases (97 citations). I. Dolka has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Italy and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Magdalena Król, R. Sapierzyński, Artur Żbikowski, T. Motyl, P. Szeleszczuk, Karol Pawłowski, Beata Dolka, Michał Czopowicz, Katarzyna Zabielska-Koczywąs and R. Lechowski. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Veterinary Research, Journal of Comparative Pathology, Veterinary Research Communications, Scientific Reports and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact