I. Borges

151 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

I. Borges
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 810
  • Forestry 292
  • Animal Science and Zoology 273
  • Soil Science 248
  • Equine 30
Replace Anderson de Moura Zanine with:
Anderson de Moura Zanine Brazil
L.C. Gonçalves Brazil
G.P. Cosgrove New Zealand
E.O.S. Saliba Brazil
José Henrique Souza da Silva Brazil
Dari Celestino Alves Filho Brazil
Daniele de Jesus Ferreira Brazil
Fabiano Ferreira da Silva Brazil
U. Krishnamoorthy India
K. P. Coffey United States
I. Borges relative to Anderson de Moura Zanine Brazil Anderson de Moura Zanine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Anderson de Moura Zanine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. Borges

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Borges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Borges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Borges more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Borges

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Borges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Borges. The network helps show where I. Borges may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. Borges, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. Borges Line = papers co-authored together I. Borges links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 155 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201053
2 200933
3 200331
4 200429
5 200729
6 201529
7 200928
8 201927
9 200726
10 200424
11 200224
12 200423
13 200720
14 201920
15 200919
16 201319
17 200417
18
MARCHA DE ABSORÇÃO DE MACRONUTRIENTES E ACÚMULO DE MATÉRIA SECA EM MILHO
200916
19 201816
20
Fiber quality for ruminant diets.
200714

About I. Borges

I. Borges is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Forestry and Soil Science, having authored 155 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (99 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (27 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (27 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (27 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (25 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (14 papers), Phytase and its Applications (14 papers) and Nuts composition and effects (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (810 citations), Forestry (292 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (273 citations), Soil Science (248 citations) and Equine (30 citations). I. Borges has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Portugal and United States. Frequent co-authors include L.C. Gonçalves, N. M. Rodríguez, J. A. S. Rodrigues, E.O.S. Saliba, A.L.C.C. Borges, Gilberto de Lima Macedo, José Neuman Miranda Neiva, Thierry Ribeiro Tomich, Rogério Martins Maurício and Renzo Garcia Von Pinho. Their work appears in journals such as Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Ciência Agronômica/Revista ciência agronômica, Small Ruminant Research, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências and Tropical Animal Health and Production.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact