Hung‐Mo Lin

126 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Hung‐Mo Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 412
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 388
  • Developmental Neuroscience 245
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1000
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 139
Replace Peter Rock with:
Peter Rock United States
Shahzad Shaefi United States
Robert Jan Stolker Netherlands
Edward Litton Australia
N. David Yanez United States
Ho Geol Ryu South Korea
Marcus Müllner Austria
Theresa O’Connor United States
Sergi Sabaté Spain
Wolfgang Bühre Netherlands
Hung‐Mo Lin relative to Peter Rock United States Peter Rock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Peter Rock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hung‐Mo Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hung‐Mo Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hung‐Mo Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hung‐Mo Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hung‐Mo Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hung‐Mo Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hung‐Mo Lin. The network helps show where Hung‐Mo Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hung‐Mo Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hung‐Mo Lin Line = papers co-authored together Hung‐Mo Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 134 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017223
2 2009159
3 2011131
4 2010110
5 2011105
6 2014105
7 201888
8 199873
9 201471
10 200760
11 199653
12 201350
13 201348
14 201346
15 200645
16 201941
17 201541
18 202039
19 201938
20 201738

About Hung‐Mo Lin

Hung‐Mo Lin is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Statistics and Probability, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 134 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (33 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (15 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (13 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (11 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (10 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (10 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (8 papers) and Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (412 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (388 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (245 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1000 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (139 citations). Hung‐Mo Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Matthew A. Levin, Stacie Deiner, Gregory W. Fischer, Patrick J. McCormick, Randall B. Griepp, John Williamson, David B. Wax, David L. Reich, Gabriele Di Luozzo and Andrew B. Leibowitz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Anesthesia & Analgesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact