Hubert Höfer

54 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Hubert Höfer
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Ecological Modeling 168
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 315
  • Soil Science 227
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 433
  • Horticulture 20
Replace Noor Farikhah Haneda with:
Noor Farikhah Haneda Indonesia
M. D. Farnon Ellwood United Kingdom
Kaoru Niiyama Japan
Colin R. Maycock Malaysia
Alexandra Chadwick Netherlands
Mark P. Dobrowolski Australia
Leigh C. Moorhead United States
Marcelo Brilhante de Medeiros Brazil
Luis J. Oakley Argentina
Ekananda Paudel China
Hubert Höfer relative to Noor Farikhah Haneda Indonesia Noor Farikhah Haneda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Noor Farikhah Haneda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hubert Höfer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hubert Höfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hubert Höfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hubert Höfer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hubert Höfer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hubert Höfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hubert Höfer. The network helps show where Hubert Höfer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hubert Höfer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hubert Höfer Line = papers co-authored together Hubert Höfer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016200
2 2016111
3 2004104
4 200495
5 200189
6 201461
7 200457
8 200651
9 200039
10 200237
11 200135
12
State of knowledge of earthworm communities in German soils as a basis for biological soil quality assessment
201332
13 200930
14 201825
15 201225
16 199422
17 199617
18 201914
19 201513
20 199713

About Hubert Höfer

Hubert Höfer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Soil Science, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies (21 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (11 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (10 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (8 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (168 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (315 citations), Soil Science (227 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (433 citations) and Horticulture (20 citations). Hubert Höfer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jörg Römbke, Christopher Martius, Marcos Valério Garcia, ANTONIO DOMINGOS BRESCOVIT, Bernhard Förster, Ludwig Beck, Elizabeth Franklin, David J. Russell, Jörg Spelda and Jonas J. Astrin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Arachnology, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Insect Conservation and Diversity and Database.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact