Hsiao-Ling Chiang
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hsiao-Ling Chiang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hsiao-Ling Chiang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hsiao-Ling Chiang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hsiao-Ling Chiang. Hsiao-Ling Chiang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hsiao-Ling Chiang
4 papers receiving 248 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Hsiao-Ling Chiang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hsiao-Ling Chiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hsiao-Ling Chiang. The network helps show where Hsiao-Ling Chiang may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Hsiao-Ling Chiang
This map shows the geographic impact of Hsiao-Ling Chiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hsiao-Ling Chiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hsiao-Ling Chiang more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.