Howard J. Williams

5.1k citations
170 papers · 4.1k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Howard J. Williams

168 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Howard J. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Insect Science 1.4k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 888
  • Plant Science 945
  • Molecular Biology 1.5k
  • Organic Chemistry 609
Replace Neil J. Oldham with:
Neil J. Oldham United Kingdom
A. C. Oehlschlager Canada
Robert M. Hollingworth United States
Robin T. Aplin United Kingdom
Herschel K. Mitchell United States
Keiichiro Nishimura Japan
D. Daloze Belgium
Kyosuke Nomoto Japan
Wilhelm Boland Germany
Lothar Jaenicke Germany
Howard J. Williams relative to Neil J. Oldham United Kingdom Neil J. Oldham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Neil J. Oldham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Howard J. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Howard J. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Howard J. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Howard J. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Howard J. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Howard J. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Howard J. Williams. The network helps show where Howard J. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Howard J. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Howard J. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Howard J. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 170 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011121
2 2013108
3 198490
4 198390
5 199387
6 198184
7 201184
8 201379
9 200368
10 198566
11 198665
12 200664
13 199364
14 199763
15 200255
16 199355
17 200151
18 199748
19 198848
20 200048

About Howard J. Williams

Howard J. Williams is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Insect Science, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 170 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (29 papers), Plant and animal studies (28 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (27 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (17 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (16 papers), Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders (15 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (13 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.4k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (888 citations), Plant Science (945 citations), Molecular Biology (1.5k citations) and Organic Chemistry (609 citations). Howard J. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include S. Bradleigh Vinson, A. Ian Scott, G. W. Elzen, Frank M. Raushel, S. B. Vinson, Ronald J. Nachman, Guillermo Moyna, Siddhesh S. Kamat, Robert D. Stipanovic and Gordon W. Frankie. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Ecology, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Biochemistry, Phytochemistry and Environmental Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact