Ho‐Min Chen

92 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Ho‐Min Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Strategy and Management 473
  • Business and International Management 31
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 95
  • Accounting 150
  • Orthodontics 37
Replace Rui Shen with:
Rui Shen China
Helen Simpson United Kingdom
Patricia A. Robinson United States
Henry Tsai United States
Gaurav Nayyar United States
Chih‐Wei Wang Taiwan
James A. Wolff United States
Vivek Tandon India
Dilip K. Das Kuwait
Ho‐Min Chen relative to Rui Shen China Rui Shen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Rui Shen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ho‐Min Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ho‐Min Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ho‐Min Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ho‐Min Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ho‐Min Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ho‐Min Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ho‐Min Chen. The network helps show where Ho‐Min Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ho‐Min Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ho‐Min Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ho‐Min Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014179
2 2012150
3 200964
4 201046
5 202142
6 201740
7 201639
8 201139
9 201237
10 201534
11 202029
12 201928
13 201628
14 201727
15 202126
16 201426
17 202026
18 200923
19 202023
20 202221

About Ho‐Min Chen

Ho‐Min Chen is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Business and FDI (9 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (8 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (7 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (6 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (5 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (473 citations), Business and International Management (31 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (95 citations), Accounting (150 citations) and Orthodontics (37 citations). Ho‐Min Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chia‐Wen Hsu, Yung-Chih Lien, Szu‐Yuan Wu, Yu‐Yun Shao, Ann‐Lii Cheng, Mei‐Shu Lai, Fei‐Yuan Hsiao, Chang-Yun Lu, Jiaqiang Zhang and Zhong‐Zhe Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, The Oncologist, Journal of World Business, Journal of Clinical Oncology and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact