Hollie S. Jones

19 papers receiving 405 citations

Peers

Hollie S. Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 181
  • Applied Psychology 99
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 156
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 68
  • Social Psychology 112
Replace Alister McCormick with:
Alister McCormick United Kingdom
Petrus Gantois Brazil
Eduardo Macedo Penna Brazil
G. Tenenbaum Israel
Paul Solberg Norway
Nickolas C. Smith United Kingdom
Jonas De Wachter Belgium
Noel P. Kinrade United Kingdom
Boris Blumenstein Israel
Helgo Schomer South Africa
Hollie S. Jones relative to Alister McCormick United Kingdom Alister McCormick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Alister McCormick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hollie S. Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hollie S. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hollie S. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hollie S. Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hollie S. Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hollie S. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hollie S. Jones. The network helps show where Hollie S. Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hollie S. Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hollie S. Jones Line = papers co-authored together Hollie S. Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201466
2 201864
3 201352
4 201745
5 201728
6 201423
7 201520
8 201620
9 201319
10 201616
11 201515
12 201713
13 201710
14 20169
15
Gambling behavior in Great Britain in 2015
20173
16 20173
17
Follow-up study of loyalty card customers: Changes in gambling behaviour over time
20172
18 20171
19 20151

About Hollie S. Jones

Hollie S. Jones is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Performance and Training (11 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (10 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (2 papers), Genetics and Physical Performance (2 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (181 citations), Applied Psychology (99 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (156 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (68 citations) and Social Psychology (112 citations). Hollie S. Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Emily L. Williams, Lars R. McNaughton, S. Andy Sparks, Adrian W. Midgley, David Marchant, Craig A. Bridge, Alister McCormick, Carla Meijen, Dominic Micklewright and Amy Whitehead. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Frontiers in Physiology, Journal of science and medicine in sport, International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology and The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact