Hogene Kim

33 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers

Hogene Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 178
  • Rehabilitation 106
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 140
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 62
  • Neurology 56
Replace Philip J. Melchiorre with:
Philip J. Melchiorre United States
Rory Suomi United States
Chia-Cheng Lin United States
Julie D. Ries United States
Trina K. DeMott United States
Cheryl D. Ford-Smith United States
Hiroaki Sakurai Japan
Gülçin Kaymak Karataş Türkiye
Lih-Jiun Liaw Taiwan
Alison Llewellyn United Kingdom
Hogene Kim relative to Philip J. Melchiorre United States Philip J. Melchiorre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×34×
Philip J. Melchiorre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hogene Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hogene Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hogene Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hogene Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hogene Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hogene Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hogene Kim. The network helps show where Hogene Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hogene Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hogene Kim Line = papers co-authored together Hogene Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201142
2 201138
3 201635
4 201534
5 201034
6 201329
7 201527
8 202120
9 201217
10 201317
11 202113
12 201210
13 20129
14 20158
15 20128
16 20198
17 20238
18 20137
19 20157
20 20247

About Hogene Kim

Hogene Kim is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation, Biomedical Engineering and Neurology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (23 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (20 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (16 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (8 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers) and Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (178 citations), Rehabilitation (106 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (140 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (62 citations) and Neurology (56 citations). Hogene Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include James A. Ashton‐Miller, James K. Richardson, Lara Allet, James T. Eckner, Ji-Eun Cho, David B. Lipps, Trina K. DeMott, Joseph O. Nnodim, Youkeun K. Oh and Joon‐Ho Shin. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Gait & Posture, Muscle & Nerve, Journal of Biomechanics and PM&R.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact