Hind Moussa

710 citations
27 papers · 352 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Hind Moussa

25 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Hind Moussa
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 165
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 103
  • Rheumatology 42
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 39
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 27
Replace Kati Tihtonen with:
Kati Tihtonen Finland
Katsuhiko Tada Japan
Haritha Sagili India
Alessandra Cacciatore Italy
Yuichiro Nakai Japan
Eng Loy Tan Singapore
Onome Ogueh United Kingdom
Johanne Dubé Canada
Nóirín Russell Ireland
Aydın Çorakçı Türkiye
Hind Moussa relative to Kati Tihtonen Finland Kati Tihtonen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Kati Tihtonen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hind Moussa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hind Moussa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hind Moussa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hind Moussa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hind Moussa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hind Moussa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hind Moussa. The network helps show where Hind Moussa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hind Moussa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hind Moussa Line = papers co-authored together Hind Moussa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201668
2 201465
3 201644
4 201625
5 201619
6 201617
7 201615
8 201713
9 201613
10 201510
11 20099
12 20149
13 20148
14 20167
15 20236
16 20185
17 20153
18 20153
19 20163
20 20193

About Hind Moussa

Hind Moussa is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (10 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (6 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (5 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (5 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (3 papers), Pregnancy and Medication Impact (3 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers) and Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (165 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (103 citations), Rheumatology (42 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (39 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (27 citations). Hind Moussa has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include Baha M. Sibai, Sara E. Arian, Sean C. Blackwell, Monica Longo, Claudia Pedroza, Sean Blackwell, Hector Mendez‐Figueroa, Baha M. Sibai, Jerrie Refuerzo and Hina Rehman. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, American Journal of Perinatology, Expert Opinion on Drug Safety and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact