Hill Gates

1.8k citations
40 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Hill Gates

33 papers receiving 820 citations

Peers

Hill Gates
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Cultural Studies 159
  • Sociology and Political Science 796
  • Anthropology 162
  • Gender Studies 148
  • Political Science and International Relations 354
Replace Ania Loomba with:
Ania Loomba United States
Leela Gandhi Australia
James Donald United States
Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar United States
Ian Birchall Canada
Ian Buruma United States
Bertram Wyatt‐Brown United States
Philip Corrigan United Kingdom
Jane Caplan United States
Michael Rogin United States
Hill Gates relative to Ania Loomba United States Ania Loomba's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ania Loomba · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hill Gates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hill Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hill Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hill Gates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hill Gates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hill Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hill Gates. The network helps show where Hill Gates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Hill Gates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hill Gates Line = papers co-authored together Hill Gates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998443
2 1997142
3
The Anthropology of Taiwanese Society
199783
4 199961
5 198741
6 199740
7 198939
8 197934
9 199433
10
Marxist Approaches in Economic Anthropology
199124
11 200124
12 199724
13 201120
14 200516
15 201214
16 198511
17 198910
18 198710
19 19979
20 19968

About Hill Gates

Hill Gates is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations, History and Gender Studies, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (10 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Japanese History and Culture (3 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (2 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (2 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (1 paper) and Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (159 citations), Sociology and Political Science (796 citations), Anthropology (162 citations), Gender Studies (148 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (354 citations). Hill Gates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Yunxiang Yan, T. Gold, Emily Martin Ahern, Eugene Cooper, Robert B. Marks, Laurel Bossen, Alice Littlefield, Shu‐Ling Tsai, Melissa J. Brown and Arthur P. Wolf. Their work appears in journals such as Modern China, The American Historical Review, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Pacific Affairs and Ethnohistory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact