Herbert R. Chen

41 papers receiving 875 citations

Peers

Herbert R. Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Nephrology 426
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 126
  • Oncology 179
  • Surgery 202
  • Epidemiology 118
Replace Daniela Betea with:
Daniela Betea Belgium
Kelly Lauter Roszko United States
Stiina Välimäki Sweden
Virendra Ashokrao Patil India
Tobias Åkerström Sweden
Zdeněk Fryšák Czechia
An Hang Yang Taiwan
Louis‐Joseph Auguste United States
Graeme E. Wilkins Canada
Yoshihito Hara Japan
Herbert R. Chen relative to Daniela Betea Belgium Daniela Betea's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28×
Daniela Betea · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Herbert R. Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert R. Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert R. Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert R. Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert R. Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert R. Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert R. Chen. The network helps show where Herbert R. Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Herbert R. Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Herbert R. Chen Line = papers co-authored together Herbert R. Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999286
2 2013132
3 201947
4 201531
5 200728
6 201527
7 201927
8 202027
9 202027
10 201924
11 201822
12 201322
13 201919
14 199915
15 200514
16 202413
17 202012
18 201411
19 200411
20 202310

About Herbert R. Chen

Herbert R. Chen is a scholar working on Nephrology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Neurology, Oncology and Surgery, having authored 50 papers that have together received 896 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (19 papers), Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery (10 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (8 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (4 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (4 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (3 papers) and Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (426 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (126 citations), Oncology (179 citations), Surgery (202 citations) and Epidemiology (118 citations). Herbert R. Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Lori J. Sokoll, Robert Udelsman, Brenessa M. Lindeman, Sophie Y. Dream, Ammar A. Asban, Rebecca S. Sippel, Rongzhi Wang, John Bart Rose, James A. Bibb and Sebastian K. Chung. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, Annals of Surgery, Surgery and The American Surgeon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact