Helen Wright

25 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

Helen Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 54
  • Information Systems and Management 87
  • Rehabilitation 50
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 167
  • Human-Computer Interaction 34
Replace Yalong Yang with:
Yalong Yang United States
David Arnold United Kingdom
Jaewon Kim South Korea
Timo Laakko Finland
Sungahn Ko United States
Khairan Rajab Saudi Arabia
Thomas J. Cashman United Kingdom
Ekaterina Olshannikova Finland
Ebad Banissi United Kingdom
Helen Wright relative to Yalong Yang United States Yalong Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Yalong Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Wright. The network helps show where Helen Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helen Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen Wright Line = papers co-authored together Helen Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996104
2 200096
3 199782
4 199368
5 199654
6 200727
7 200618
8 199618
9 200014
10 200812
11 20078
12 19965
13
Computational Steering by Direct Image Manipulation
20014
14 20144
15 20004
16 19993
17 19963
18 20003
19 20032
20 20042

About Helen Wright

Helen Wright is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Management and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 28 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (10 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (8 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (7 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (6 papers), Computational Physics and Python Applications (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (2 papers) and Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (54 citations), Information Systems and Management (87 citations), Rehabilitation (50 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (167 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (34 citations). Helen Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ken Brodlie, Ruth Ä. Schmidt, Jason Wood, Tom Clarke, V.S. Devaraj, Roy Powell, Christopher Stone, R. J. Wootton, Iain Barber and Tim David. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Technology Management, Journal of Proteome Research, Journal of Fish Biology, Virtual Reality and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact