Helen How

791 citations
21 papers · 467 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Helen How

20 papers receiving 435 citations

Peers

Helen How
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 267
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 222
  • Hematology 74
  • Genetics 56
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 132
Replace James F. McCaul with:
James F. McCaul United States
Charles M. Stedman United States
Manuel Álvarez United States
Marc H. Incerpi United States
Fionnuala Mone United Kingdom
Suleiman A. Al‐Suleiman Saudi Arabia
Karen E. Mehalek United States
Vanessa A. Barss United States
Doron Dukler Israel
Robbert J. P. Rijnders Netherlands
Helen How relative to James F. McCaul United States James F. McCaul's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
James F. McCaul · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen How

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen How's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen How with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen How more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen How

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen How. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen How. The network helps show where Helen How may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helen How, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen How Line = papers co-authored together Helen How links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200871
2 200970
3 199153
4 200840
5 200837
6 199134
7 199632
8 200825
9 199124
10 201423
11 200820
12 200614
13 20119
14 20195
15 20063
16 20053
17 20141
18 20071
19 20071
20 20061

About Helen How

Helen How is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Hematology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (6 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (6 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (5 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (4 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (267 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (222 citations), Hematology (74 citations), Genetics (56 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (132 citations). Helen How has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Baha M. Sibai, Annette Bombrys, Mounira Habli, Stanley A. Gall, Mark R. Gray, Michael J. Corwin, Caroline Stella, Leeya F. Pinder, N Eftekhari and John R. Barton. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Journal of Perinatology, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, Journal of Clinical Apheresis and Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact