Harold Crouch

2.1k citations
43 papers · 962 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Harold Crouch

40 papers receiving 684 citations

Peers

Harold Crouch
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Political Science and International Relations 437
  • Sociology and Political Science 755
  • Development 55
  • Anthropology 79
  • Law 53
Replace R. William Liddle with:
R. William Liddle United States
Howard J. Wiarda United States
Brian Loveman United States
Victor T. Le Vine United States
Justus M. van der Kroef United States
Robert Bothwell Canada
Susanne Hoeber Rudolph United States
Lionel Rothkrug Canada
Paul D. Hutchcroft Australia
Ethan Scheiner United States
Harold Crouch relative to R. William Liddle United States R. William Liddle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
R. William Liddle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Harold Crouch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Harold Crouch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harold Crouch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harold Crouch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Harold Crouch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harold Crouch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harold Crouch. The network helps show where Harold Crouch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Harold Crouch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Harold Crouch Line = papers co-authored together Harold Crouch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996164
2 2010127
3 1972124
4 1979114
5 1978107
6
The Aceh Peace Process: Why it Failed
200368
7 197929
8 201923
9 198423
10 197520
11
Militer dan politik di Indonesia
198620
12 199311
13
Growth and Democracy in Southeast Asia
199810
14 19939
15 19838
16 19738
17 19988
18 19888
19 19817
20 20007

About Harold Crouch

Harold Crouch is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory, Development and Anthropology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Studies and History (28 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (4 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (3 papers), International Development and Aid (2 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (2 papers), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (1 paper), Legal Studies and Policies (1 paper) and Indonesian Election Politics and Participation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (437 citations), Sociology and Political Science (755 citations), Development (55 citations), Anthropology (79 citations) and Law (53 citations). Harold Crouch has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Donald S. Zagoria, Edward Aspinall, John Bresnan, Jeffrey A. Winters, Adam J. Schwarz, Kevin Hewison, Garry Rodan, Jacques Bertrand, Robert J. Muscat and Richard Robison. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, Indonesia, World Politics, Foreign Affairs and The Pacific Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact