Han Chen

45 papers receiving 754 citations

Peers

Han Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 125
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 28
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 197
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 30
  • Molecular Medicine 29
Replace İbrahim Akkurt with:
İbrahim Akkurt Türkiye
Guoying Huang China
José A. Lorente Spain
Gopi Chand Khilnani India
Horng‐Chyuan Lin Taiwan
Sumeet Jain United States
Chien-Ling Su Taiwan
Ji-Hyun Lee South Korea
Renhua Sun China
Delores E. Graham United States
Han Chen relative to İbrahim Akkurt Türkiye İbrahim Akkurt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.6×
İbrahim Akkurt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Han Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Han Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Han Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Han Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Han Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Han Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Han Chen. The network helps show where Han Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Han Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Han Chen Line = papers co-authored together Han Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017124
2 1985100
3 201193
4 201582
5 202166
6 201827
7 202127
8 201623
9 202120
10 201820
11 202219
12 202216
13 202315
14 202015
15 202213
16 202312
17 201810
18 20239
19 20149
20 20228

About Han Chen

Han Chen is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, having authored 48 papers that have together received 779 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (10 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (125 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (28 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (197 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (30 citations) and Molecular Medicine (29 citations). Han Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Zhou Jian-xin, Rongguo Yu, Brian Kavanagh, Richard B. Brown, Daniel Teres, David W. Hosmer, Michael Sands, Xiao Yun, Qirui Zhong and Tianbo Huang. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, BMC Neurology, Critical Care, BMC Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact