Hamish Pearson

17 papers receiving 383 citations

Peers

Hamish Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Building and Construction 147
  • Polymers and Plastics 103
  • Biomaterials 90
  • Biomedical Engineering 125
  • Archeology 27
Replace Thomas Schnabel with:
Thomas Schnabel Austria
Anthony J. Michell Australia
Stefanie Wieland Austria
Satoshi Shida Japan
Jürgen Odermatt Germany
Urve Kallavus Estonia
Lang-Dong Lin Taiwan
Mounir Chaouch France
Jan Baar Czechia
Leandro Passarini United States
Hamish Pearson relative to Thomas Schnabel Austria Thomas Schnabel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Thomas Schnabel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hamish Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hamish Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hamish Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hamish Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hamish Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hamish Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hamish Pearson. The network helps show where Hamish Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Hamish Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hamish Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Hamish Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2016159
2 200438
3 202027
4 201725
5 197523
6 201422
7 201213
8 201212
9 201411
10 200411
11
N-ViroTech--a novel process for the treatment of nutrient limited wastewaters.
200411
12 201811
13 20199
14 20059
15 20108
16 20224
17
Creep and Mechanosorption of Wood at High Temperature
20111
18 20230

About Hamish Pearson

Hamish Pearson is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Biomedical Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Mechanical Engineering and Plant Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wood Treatment and Properties (11 papers), Lignin and Wood Chemistry (5 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (4 papers), Forest ecology and management (4 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (3 papers), Bamboo properties and applications (2 papers), Polymer Foaming and Composites (2 papers) and Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Building and Construction (147 citations), Polymers and Plastics (103 citations), Biomaterials (90 citations), Biomedical Engineering (125 citations) and Archeology (27 citations). Hamish Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alan Dickson, Stefan Hill, Mathias Sorieul, Bernard S. W. Dawson, Shusheng Pang, Brian Gabbitas, Sigurdur Ormarsson, Mark O. Kimberley, Regitze R. Vold and H. Huber. Their work appears in journals such as Holzforschung, Wood Science and Technology, The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Materials and Drying Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact