Haley Sanderson

468 citations
13 papers · 299 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Haley Sanderson

13 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Haley Sanderson
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Molecular Medicine 87
  • Pollution 150
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 22
  • Microbiology 27
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 32
Replace Céline Heinemann with:
Céline Heinemann Germany
Sara A. Burgess New Zealand
Beatus Lyimo Tanzania
Ross S. McInnes United Kingdom
Alfred PÃ ⁄ hler Germany
Maria Braoudaki United Kingdom
Roosmarijn E. C. Luiken Netherlands
Shixiong Yan China
Saharuetai Jeamsripong Thailand
Haley Sanderson relative to Céline Heinemann Germany Céline Heinemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Céline Heinemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Haley Sanderson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Haley Sanderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Haley Sanderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Haley Sanderson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Haley Sanderson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Haley Sanderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Haley Sanderson. The network helps show where Haley Sanderson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Haley Sanderson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Haley Sanderson Line = papers co-authored together Haley Sanderson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2016168
2 202036
3 202027
4 201914
5 201912
6 202011
7 201911
8 20199
9 20236
10 20232
11 20251
12 20241
13 20241

About Haley Sanderson

Haley Sanderson is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, Pollution, Animal Science and Zoology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (2 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (2 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (2 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (2 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (2 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (1 paper) and Nosocomial Infections in ICU (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (87 citations), Pollution (150 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (22 citations), Microbiology (27 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (32 citations). Haley Sanderson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Iran and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Steven N. Liss, R. Stephen Brown, Anna Majury, Colin Fricker, Tim A. McAllister, Rahat Zaheer, Rodrigo Ortega Polo, Kingsley K. Amoako, Noriko Goji and Cassidy L. Klima. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, BMC Microbiology, Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Microbiological Methods and Research in Veterinary Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact