Hai Su

3.5k citations
50 papers · 2.3k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Hai Su

47 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Hai Su
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Biophysics 303
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 907
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.1k
  • Health Informatics 40
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 471
Replace Hongmin Cai with:
Hongmin Cai China
Tao Jiang China
Xiaofan Zhang United States
Tao Wan China
Yilong Yin China
Banshidhar Majhi India
Md Mamunur Rahaman China
Shadrokh Samavi Iran
Sheraz Ahmed Germany
Yinghuan Shi China
Hai Su relative to Hongmin Cai China Hongmin Cai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Hongmin Cai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hai Su

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hai Su's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hai Su with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hai Su more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hai Su

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hai Su. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hai Su. The network helps show where Hai Su may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hai Su, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hai Su Line = papers co-authored together Hai Su links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017298
2 2011202
3 2019198
4 2011184
5 2019179
6 2015128
7 201791
8 201280
9 201279
10 201471
11 201568
12 201564
13 201561
14 201559
15 201857
16 201451
17 201550
18 201941
19 201539
20 201637

About Hai Su

Hai Su is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Media Technology, Biophysics and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 50 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (19 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (8 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (8 papers), Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (6 papers), Image Processing Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (6 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (6 papers) and Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (303 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (907 citations), Artificial Intelligence (1.1k citations), Health Informatics (40 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (471 citations). Hai Su has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Fuyong Xing, Lin Yang, Yuanpu Xie, Qian Wang, Kui Ren, Fujun Liu, Xiangfei Kong, Kwangjo Kim, Juhua Liu and Bo Du. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Image Analysis, Nature Machine Intelligence, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, IEEE Communications Magazine and Neurocomputing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact