H. v. Pechmann

3.2k citations
26 papers · 172 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

H. v. Pechmann

20 papers receiving 102 citations

Peers

H. v. Pechmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Insect Science 69
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 36
  • Cell Biology 39
  • Ecology 45
  • Building and Construction 23
Replace Karl E. Wolter with:
Karl E. Wolter United States
D. S. Skene United Kingdom
B. G. Cumbie United States
C. G. Forshey United States
D. J. Avery United Kingdom
Jerry W. Riffle United States
W. M. Porter United States
W. Newall United States
Andrew G. Gordon Canada
R. V. Singh India
H. v. Pechmann relative to Karl E. Wolter United States Karl E. Wolter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
Karl E. Wolter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. v. Pechmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. v. Pechmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. v. Pechmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. v. Pechmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. v. Pechmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. v. Pechmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. v. Pechmann. The network helps show where H. v. Pechmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside H. v. Pechmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. v. Pechmann Line = papers co-authored together H. v. Pechmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197128
2 196819
3 195918
4 196417
5 197311
6 19608
7 19538
8 19728
9 19547
10
Untersuchungen über die Rotstreifigkeit des Fichtenholzes
19676
11 19635
12 19635
13 19555
14 19704
15 19624
16 19743
17 19703
18 19752
19 19552
20 19632

About H. v. Pechmann

H. v. Pechmann is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Plant Science, Building and Construction, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Insect Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (5 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (5 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (5 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (3 papers) and Engineering and Materials Science Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (69 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (36 citations), Cell Biology (39 citations), Ecology (45 citations) and Building and Construction (23 citations). H. v. Pechmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include W. Líese, K. E. Rehfuess and H Courtois. Their work appears in journals such as Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt and European Journal of Wood and Wood Products.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact