H. Toonen

529 citations
9 papers · 431 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

H. Toonen

9 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

H. Toonen
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Ophthalmology 356
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 302
  • Internal Medicine 7
  • Neurology 24
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 35
Replace N. Körber with:
N. Körber Germany
Alexander H. Rulo Netherlands
Kenji Sogawa Japan
Cecília Czakó Hungary
Dana Madison Deupree United States
Tina Khanam United Kingdom
Ian Dooley Ireland
Jesper Leth Hougaard Denmark
David A. Price United States
Kanemitsu Muraoka Japan
H. Toonen relative to N. Körber Germany N. Körber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
N. Körber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Toonen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Toonen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Toonen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Toonen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Toonen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Toonen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Toonen. The network helps show where H. Toonen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside H. Toonen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Toonen Line = papers co-authored together H. Toonen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1991249
2 1991118
3 199020
4 199017
5
[Quantifying retinal capillary circulation using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope].
199014
6
Measurement of retinal micro- and macrocirculation in patients with diabetes mellitus with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy
19928
7
[The microvasculature and microcirculation of the peri-macular capillary network. New diagnostic possibilities with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope].
19923
8 20091
9 20051

About H. Toonen

H. Toonen is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Imaging and Analysis (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (356 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (302 citations), Internal Medicine (7 citations), Neurology (24 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (35 citations). H. Toonen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sebastián Wolf, F. Jung, Oliver Arend, M. Reim, Bernd Bertram, H. Kiesewetter, D. Meyer‐Ebrecht, C. Mrowietz, E. Wenzel and Gerhard Müller. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact