H. Schmidt

649 citations
19 papers · 484 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

H. Schmidt

19 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

H. Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Condensed Matter Physics 331
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 212
  • Ophthalmology 49
  • Developmental Neuroscience 13
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 56
Replace J. G. F. Worst with:
J. G. F. Worst Netherlands
Yiou Zhang China
Patrick Pittet France
Hiroshi Suzuki Japan
Yohei Ikebe Japan
Wenqing Fang China
Hyo‐Gun Kim United States
T. Suzuki Japan
Keisuke Abe Japan
H. Schmidt relative to J. G. F. Worst Netherlands J. G. F. Worst's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
J. G. F. Worst · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Schmidt. The network helps show where H. Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together H. Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2002124
2 196188
3 200188
4 200349
5 200334
6 198926
7 198417
8 198515
9 198810
10 19738
11 19867
12
A new procedure for correcting background in quantitative autoradiographic studies.
19895
13 19994
14 19813
15 19812
16 19851
17 19831
18
Low-frequency resonance curves associated with non-linear internal friction
19841
19 19811

About H. Schmidt

H. Schmidt is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic Properties of Alloys (4 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (4 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (4 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (3 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (2 papers), Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (2 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (331 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (212 citations), Ophthalmology (49 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (13 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (56 citations). H. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include D. G. Hinks, K. E. Gray, J. F. Zasadzinski, Irwin M. Siegel, Milton M. Zaret, Harris Ripps, Goodwin M. Breinin, Hubert Korr, J. Burley and Maxim Avdeev. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Solid State Communications, Physica C Superconductivity, Journal of Low Temperature Physics and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact