H. Schillinger

687 citations
29 papers · 573 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

H. Schillinger

26 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers

H. Schillinger
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 437
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 169
  • Mechanics of Materials 159
  • Spectroscopy 105
  • Instrumentation 13
Replace L. Woeste with:
L. Woeste Germany
J. P. Chambaret France
A. Azarm Canada
M. Sorem United States
Kenneth W. Billman United States
F. O’Neill United Kingdom
D. A. Orlov Germany
A. N. Stepanov Russia
R. Zerne Sweden
Sima Hosseini Canada
H. Schillinger relative to L. Woeste Germany L. Woeste's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
L. Woeste · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Schillinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Schillinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Schillinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Schillinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Schillinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Schillinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Schillinger. The network helps show where H. Schillinger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Schillinger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Schillinger Line = papers co-authored together H. Schillinger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000243
2 1999124
3 199940
4 200221
5 199719
6 199918
7 199717
8 200011
9 199710
10 19929
11 19979
12 19878
13 19888
14 19926
15 19925
16
Cemented pipe-in-pipe casing strings solve field problems
19814
17 19983
18 19903
19 20133
20 19932

About H. Schillinger

H. Schillinger is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Design and Applications (11 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (9 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (9 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (5 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (4 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (3 papers) and Solid State Laser Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (437 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (169 citations), Mechanics of Materials (159 citations), Spectroscopy (105 citations) and Instrumentation (13 citations). H. Schillinger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include R. Sauerbrey, S. Niedermeier, L. Wöste, Patrick Rairoux, H. Wille, B. Stein, C. Wedekind, M. Rodriguez, C. Ziener and F. Ronneberger. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Communications, Applied Physics B, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physics of Plasmas and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact