H. R. McMaster

473 citations
13 papers · 161 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

H. R. McMaster

12 papers receiving 106 citations

Peers

H. R. McMaster
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Political Science and International Relations 107
  • Sociology and Political Science 77
  • Philosophy 16
  • Economics and Econometrics 31
  • History and Philosophy of Science 4
Replace Bernard E. Trainor with:
Bernard E. Trainor
Catherine Evtuhov United States
Gil Merom Australia
John Cunliffe United Kingdom
Frederick G. Whelan United States
Klaus Larres United Kingdom
Thomas Poole United Kingdom
André Liebich Switzerland
Renato Cristi Canada
Max Boot Netherlands
H. R. McMaster relative to Bernard E. Trainor Bernard E. Trainor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bernard E. Trainor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. R. McMaster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. R. McMaster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. R. McMaster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. R. McMaster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. R. McMaster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. R. McMaster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. R. McMaster. The network helps show where H. R. McMaster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside H. R. McMaster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. R. McMaster Line = papers co-authored together H. R. McMaster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1
Dereliction of Duty: Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam
199751
2 200829
3 199821
4 199717
5
Dereliction of Duty
199715
6 20108
7
Continuity and Change: The Army Operating Concept and Clear Thinking about Future War
20155
8
Ideas as Weapons: Influence and Perception in Modern Warfare
20095
9 20084
10 19994
11 20091
12
Battlegrounds: The Fight to Defend the Free World
20201
13 20080

About H. R. McMaster

H. R. McMaster is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Control and Systems Engineering, Philosophy and Infectious Diseases, having authored 13 papers that have together received 161 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Military History and Strategy (7 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers), European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (3 papers), Military Strategy and Technology (2 papers), Military and Defense Studies (2 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (1 paper) and Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (107 citations), Sociology and Political Science (77 citations), Philosophy (16 citations), Economics and Econometrics (31 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (4 citations). H. R. McMaster has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David C. Hendrickson, Robert A. Divine and David W. Levy. Their work appears in journals such as Survival, The American Historical Review, Orbis, Journal of Military Ethics and Foreign Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact