H. Matz

727 citations
25 papers · 555 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

H. Matz

23 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

H. Matz
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Ophthalmology 63
  • Condensed Matter Physics 82
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 139
  • Biomedical Engineering 281
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 139
Replace Alfredo Castellano with:
Alfredo Castellano Italy
Oliver Hupe Germany
Isaac L. Bass United States
V. I. Bredikhin Russia
John A. Kozub United States
P Shah India
M. Thoms Germany
Frédéric Tessier Canada
Saulius Nargelas Lithuania
G. Théobald France
H. Matz relative to Alfredo Castellano Italy Alfredo Castellano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Alfredo Castellano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Matz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Matz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Matz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Matz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Matz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Matz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Matz. The network helps show where H. Matz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Matz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Matz Line = papers co-authored together H. Matz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011124
2 1997118
3 200266
4 199956
5 199545
6 199924
7 199117
8 199916
9 200116
10 200615
11 199712
12 20008
13 20127
14
Clinical Applications of Intrasurgical SD-Optical Coherence Tomography
20106
15 20025
16 20214
17 19934
18 19903
19 20212
20 19912

About H. Matz

H. Matz is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (7 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (6 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (4 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (4 papers), Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (3 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (63 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (82 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (139 citations), Biomedical Engineering (281 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (139 citations). H. Matz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include H. Koch, D. Drung, Carl Glittenberg, Susanne Binder, Lutz Trahms, Christiane I. Falkner‐Radler, R. Kötitz, Werner Weitschies, Hartmut Gehring and E. Konecny. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Cryogenics, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing and Respiratory Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact