H. L. Thacker

62 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

H. L. Thacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Animal Science and Zoology 318
  • Infectious Diseases 396
  • Small Animals 156
  • Parasitology 136
  • Microbiology 116
Replace M. Stankiewicz with:
M. Stankiewicz Poland
Werner Nicklas Germany
Daniël Desmecht Belgium
T.F. Davison United States
Donghua Shao China
J.S. Gilmour United Kingdom
L. Gómez Spain
David Zeman United States
Ki‐Duk Song South Korea
Pyone P. Aye United States
H. L. Thacker relative to M. Stankiewicz Poland M. Stankiewicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
M. Stankiewicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. L. Thacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. L. Thacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. L. Thacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. L. Thacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. L. Thacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. L. Thacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. L. Thacker. The network helps show where H. L. Thacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. L. Thacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. L. Thacker Line = papers co-authored together H. L. Thacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007208
2 200476
3 198674
4 198668
5 199457
6 197856
7 200447
8 199337
9 197730
10 199730
11 200228
12 200428
13 199328
14 199627
15 200025
16 200124
17 198524
18 198024
19 199622
20 198022

About H. L. Thacker

H. L. Thacker is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Infectious Diseases, Parasitology, Epidemiology and Microbiology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Virus Infections Studies (10 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (10 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (10 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (9 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (7 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (5 papers), Virology and Viral Diseases (5 papers) and Coccidia and coccidiosis research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (318 citations), Infectious Diseases (396 citations), Small Animals (156 citations), Parasitology (136 citations) and Microbiology (116 citations). H. L. Thacker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include R. W. Winterfield, Rachel Y. Reams, Willie Μ. Reed, Margaret A. Miller, Alok Sharma, Paul W. Snyder, William H. Jordan, A. S. Dhillon, H. J. Olander and Mudher Albassam. Their work appears in journals such as Avian Diseases, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Poultry Science and American Journal of Veterinary Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact