H. Ho
Impact in
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Nuclear physics research studies
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
- Particle Detector Development and Performance
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
-
- Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Papers in
-
- Nuclear physics research studies 24
- Particle Detector Development and Performance 1
-
- Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies 1
- Co-authors
- J.P. Wurm (15 shared papers)Peter L. Gonthier (12 shared papers)R. Albrecht (4 shared papers)S. G. Steadman (2 shared papers)G. Graw (2 shared papers)M.N. Namboodiri (7 shared papers)J. B. Natowitz (7 shared papers)Kris Hagel (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nuclear Physics A (8 papers)The European Physical Journal A (6 papers)Physics Letters B (5 papers)Physical Review Letters (2 papers)Physical Review C (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesPoland
In The Last Decade
H. Ho
25 papers receiving 768 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 9
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 809
- Radiation 4
- Modeling and Simulation 1
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 2
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 2
Countries citing papers authored by H. Ho
This map shows the geographic impact of H. Ho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Ho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Ho more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. Ho
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Ho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Ho. The network helps show where H. Ho may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Ho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 117 | |
| 2 | 1975 | 96 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 95 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 93 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 50 | |
| 6 | 1983 | 47 | |
| 7 | 1984 | 44 | |
| 8 | 1980 | 35 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 31 | |
| 10 | 1980 | 25 | |
| 11 | 1983 | 25 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 23 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 22 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 17 | |
| 15 | 1982 | 17 | |
| 16 | 1981 | 16 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 7 |
About H. Ho
H. Ho is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Waste Management and Disposal and Infectious Diseases, having authored 25 papers that have together received 814 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear physics research studies (24 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (1 paper) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (809 citations), Radiation (4 citations), Modeling and Simulation (1 citation), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (2 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (2 citations). H. Ho has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include J.P. Wurm, Peter L. Gonthier, R. Albrecht, S. G. Steadman, G. Graw, M.N. Namboodiri, J. B. Natowitz, Kris Hagel, Fernand Scheibling and V. Rauch. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics A, The European Physical Journal A, Physics Letters B, Physical Review Letters and Physical Review C.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.