Gregory Schopen
Impact in
- Religious studies top 0.2%
- Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Anthropology top 2%
- Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Eurasian Exchange Networks
Papers in
-
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 49
- Anthropology 21
- Eurasian Exchange Networks 19
- Co-authors
- Weston La Barre (1 shared paper)Elias Joseph Bickerman (1 shared paper)Richard G. Salomon (1 shared paper)Michel Izard (1 shared paper)R. J. Zwi Werblowsky (1 shared paper)P. Christopher Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Indian Philosophy (9 papers)History of Religions (2 papers)Numen (1 paper)Journal Asiatique (1 paper)Artibus Asiae (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Gregory Schopen
56 papers receiving 417 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Religious studies 372
- Anthropology 357
- Philosophy 99
- Sociology and Political Science 369
- Classics 26
Countries citing papers authored by Gregory Schopen
This map shows the geographic impact of Gregory Schopen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gregory Schopen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gregory Schopen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gregory Schopen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gregory Schopen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gregory Schopen. The network helps show where Gregory Schopen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Gregory Schopen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 98 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 59 | |
| 5 | 1975 | 38 | |
| 6 | 1987 | 22 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 9 | 1975 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 13 | The Buddhist "Monastery" and the Indian Garden: Aesthetics, Assimilations, and the Siting of Monastic Establishments | 2006 | 13 |
| 14 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 19 | The Good Monk and His Money in a Buddhist Monasticism of "The Mahayana Period." | 2000 | 9 |
| 20 | 2010 | 7 |
About Gregory Schopen
Gregory Schopen is a scholar working on Religious studies, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 63 papers that have together received 660 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (49 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (19 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (18 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (14 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (11 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (6 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (3 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (372 citations), Anthropology (357 citations), Philosophy (99 citations), Sociology and Political Science (369 citations) and Classics (26 citations). Gregory Schopen has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Weston La Barre, Elias Joseph Bickerman, Richard G. Salomon, Michel Izard, R. J. Zwi Werblowsky and P. Christopher Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Indian Philosophy, History of Religions, Numen, Journal Asiatique and Artibus Asiae.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.