Graham Kells

1.3k citations
28 papers · 848 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Graham Kells

28 papers receiving 846 citations

Peers

Graham Kells
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Condensed Matter Physics 475
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 815
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 60
  • Materials Chemistry 207
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 2
Replace Dganit Meidan with:
Dganit Meidan Israel
Ying-Hai Wu China
Eytan Grosfeld Israel
Doru Sticlet Romania
Stephan Plugge Germany
Gregory Bunin Israel
Shou Cheng Zhang United States
J. P. Dahlhaus Netherlands
Niccolò Traverso Ziani Italy
Nicholas Sedlmayr Poland
Graham Kells relative to Dganit Meidan Israel Dganit Meidan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dganit Meidan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Kells

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Kells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Kells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Kells more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Kells

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Kells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Kells. The network helps show where Graham Kells may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Graham Kells, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graham Kells Line = papers co-authored together Graham Kells links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012283
2 2012104
3 202362
4 201243
5 200938
6 201529
7 201428
8 200827
9 201224
10 202123
11 201723
12 202122
13 201520
14 201918
15 201016
16 201413
17 201813
18 201012
19
Spectrum of the non-abelian phase in kitaev’s honeycomb lattice model
201811
20 200911

About Graham Kells

Graham Kells is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 28 papers that have together received 848 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Topological Materials and Phenomena (17 papers), Quantum many-body systems (17 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (15 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (9 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (5 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (4 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (3 papers) and Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (475 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (815 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (60 citations), Materials Chemistry (207 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (2 citations). Graham Kells has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dganit Meidan, Piet W. Brouwer, Alessandro Romito, J. K. Slingerland, Jiří Vala, Felix von Oppen, Falko Pientka, Ville Lahtinen, L. Borsten and Diptiman Sen. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physical review. B., Physical Review Letters, Physical review. D and Physical Review Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact