Graeme Dennerstein

26 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Graeme Dennerstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Microbiology 86
  • Dermatology 60
  • Rheumatology 59
  • Urology 20
  • Epidemiology 103
Replace G Eriksson with:
G Eriksson Sweden
H Kent United States
F Mulcahy Ireland
MARVIN H. TERRY GRODY United States
Kass Eh United States
Naomi E. Reijmerink Netherlands
Odysseas Grigoriou Greece
Nóra Makra Hungary
Monica Piccoli Italy
Davey Legendre United States
Graeme Dennerstein relative to G Eriksson Sweden G Eriksson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
G Eriksson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graeme Dennerstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme Dennerstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme Dennerstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme Dennerstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme Dennerstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme Dennerstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme Dennerstein. The network helps show where Graeme Dennerstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Graeme Dennerstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graeme Dennerstein Line = papers co-authored together Graeme Dennerstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200172
2 199436
3 199635
4
Vulvitis circumscripta plasmacellularis. A clinicopathologic entity?
199325
5 196815
6
Clotrimazole: A Review of its Antifungal Activity and Therapeutic Efficacy
197512
7
Dyspareunia and vulvar disease.
199810
8 20109
9 20019
10 19958
11 20178
12
Pathogenesis and treatment of genital candidiasis.
19986
13 20175
14 19704
15 19813
16 19773
17 20213
18 19723
19 19823
20
Nipple thrush. -letter-
20032

About Graeme Dennerstein

Graeme Dennerstein is a scholar working on Surgery, Microbiology, Epidemiology, Dermatology and Rheumatology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genital Health and Disease (10 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (8 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (4 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (3 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (2 papers) and Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (86 citations), Dermatology (60 citations), Rheumatology (59 citations), Urology (20 citations) and Epidemiology (103 citations). Graeme Dennerstein has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include D. Ellis, Ian S. Fraser, James Scurry, John Brenan, Graham Mason, A.P. Dorevitch, Tania Day, Robert King, Catherine Bennett and M Bewick. Their work appears in journals such as Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Medical Journal of Australia, Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, Drugs and Australasian Journal of Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact