Gio‐Bin Lim

21 papers receiving 694 citations

Peers

Gio‐Bin Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Pharmaceutical Science 106
  • Biochemistry 63
  • Biomedical Engineering 438
  • Spectroscopy 153
  • Catalysis 64
Replace Paolo Pallado with:
Paolo Pallado Italy
Sabine Kareth Germany
Nicola De Zordi Italy
Adil Mouahid France
M.A. Tavares Cardoso Portugal
Giovana Carolina Bazzo Brazil
Daiane L. Boschetto Brazil
Alfonsina E. Andreatta Argentina
Zhongni Wang China
Benjamin J. Deadman United Kingdom
Gio‐Bin Lim relative to Paolo Pallado Italy Paolo Pallado's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Paolo Pallado · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gio‐Bin Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gio‐Bin Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gio‐Bin Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gio‐Bin Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gio‐Bin Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gio‐Bin Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gio‐Bin Lim. The network helps show where Gio‐Bin Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Gio‐Bin Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gio‐Bin Lim Line = papers co-authored together Gio‐Bin Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993274
2 2002119
3 1993118
4 199279
5 200544
6 200744
7 200428
8 201911
9 20128
10 20115
11 19955
12
Effects of Modifiers on the Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) and the Morphology of Licorice Tissue
20053
13 20193
14
Extraction of Glycyrrhizic Acid from Licorice using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide/Aqueous Ethanol
20033
15 20043
16
Extraction of Triterpenoid Saponin (glycyrrhizin) from Liquorice by Co-solvent Modified Supercritical Carbon Dioxide
20022
17 20092
18 20092
19 20182
20 20111

About Gio‐Bin Lim

Gio‐Bin Lim is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Spectroscopy and Materials Chemistry, having authored 27 papers that have together received 760 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (11 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (6 papers), Polymer Foaming and Composites (3 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (2 papers), Phytochemistry and Bioactivity Studies (2 papers) and Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (106 citations), Biochemistry (63 citations), Biomedical Engineering (438 citations), Spectroscopy (153 citations) and Catalysis (64 citations). Gio‐Bin Lim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Howard Bernstein, Sang‐Do Yeo, Jean W. Tom, Pablo G. Debenedetti, Woo Sik Kim, Robert K. Prud’homme, Sang‐Yun Lee, Hyung Joon, Dong Gyun Kang and Jeong‐Kyu Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Journal of Biotechnology, The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Biochemical Engineering Journal and Biotechnology and Bioengineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact