Gilbert Baum

628 citations
25 papers · 431 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
    • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • Oral Surgery top 10%
    • Dental Radiography and Imaging

Papers in

Gilbert Baum

25 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Gilbert Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Ophthalmology 163
  • Oral Surgery 51
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 155
  • Orthodontics 17
  • Periodontics 14
Replace Steven B. Hammerschlag with:
Steven B. Hammerschlag United States
Nadine Thieme Germany
Peter Hornby Australia
Corey C. Moore Canada
W. Buschmann Germany
Christian Betz Germany
Waleed Zaid United States
Ujwal S. Sathyam United States
Arthur Vassiliadis United States
Charles D. Kelman United States
Gilbert Baum relative to Steven B. Hammerschlag United States Steven B. Hammerschlag's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Steven B. Hammerschlag · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gilbert Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gilbert Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilbert Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilbert Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gilbert Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilbert Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilbert Baum. The network helps show where Gilbert Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Gilbert Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gilbert Baum Line = papers co-authored together Gilbert Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195897
2 196359
3 195858
4 196040
5 197830
6 195629
7 197720
8
Fundamentals of medical ultrasonography
197515
9 197512
10 196711
11 195710
12 19669
13 19637
14 19716
15 19805
16 19744
17 19654
18 19674
19 19763
20 19762

About Gilbert Baum

Gilbert Baum is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 25 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (5 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (5 papers), AI in cancer detection (3 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (3 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (2 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (2 papers) and Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (163 citations), Oral Surgery (51 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (155 citations), Orthodontics (17 citations) and Periodontics (14 citations). Gilbert Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ivan Greenwood, George W. Stroke, Erich G. Krueger, George W. Weinstein and Richard C. Troutman. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, Science, JAMA and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact