Gerald E. Poyo
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Latin American and Latino Studies
- Afro-Latin American Studies
Papers in
-
- Latin American and Latino Studies 10
-
- Cuban History and Society 18
- Religious and Theological Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Silvia Pedraza (1 shared paper)Gilberto Miguel Hinojosa (5 shared papers)Julian Samora (1 shared paper)Jorge I. Domínguez (1 shared paper)Donald Eugene Chipman (1 shared paper)Sally M. Miller (1 shared paper)John M. Kirk (1 shared paper)Louis A. Pérez (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Hispanic American Historical Review (8 papers)Journal of American History (7 papers)Journal of American Ethnic History (2 papers)The American Historical Review (1 paper)Ethnohistory (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Gerald E. Poyo
16 papers receiving 62 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Cultural Studies 65
- Space and Planetary Science 5
- Sociology and Political Science 75
- Anthropology 15
- Demography 12
Countries citing papers authored by Gerald E. Poyo
This map shows the geographic impact of Gerald E. Poyo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerald E. Poyo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerald E. Poyo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gerald E. Poyo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerald E. Poyo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerald E. Poyo. The network helps show where Gerald E. Poyo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Gerald E. Poyo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 49 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 21 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 13 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 13 | Tampa Cigarworkers and’the Struggle for Cuban Independence | 1985 | 2 |
| 14 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 1 |
About Gerald E. Poyo
Gerald E. Poyo is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Demography and Philosophy, having authored 28 papers that have together received 165 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cuban History and Society (18 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (10 papers), Latin American history and culture (6 papers), Historical Studies in Latin America (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (2 papers), Religious and Theological Studies (2 papers) and Catholicism and Religious Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (65 citations), Space and Planetary Science (5 citations), Sociology and Political Science (75 citations), Anthropology (15 citations) and Demography (12 citations). Gerald E. Poyo has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Silvia Pedraza, Gilberto Miguel Hinojosa, Julian Samora, Jorge I. Domínguez, Donald Eugene Chipman, Sally M. Miller, John M. Kirk and Louis A. Pérez. Their work appears in journals such as Hispanic American Historical Review, Journal of American History, Journal of American Ethnic History, The American Historical Review and Ethnohistory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.