George W. Patrick

1.3k citations
35 papers · 935 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

George W. Patrick

33 papers receiving 864 citations

Peers

George W. Patrick
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Numerical Analysis 439
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 352
  • Neurology 142
  • Computational Mechanics 252
  • Sensory Systems 38
Replace W. T. Kyner with:
W. T. Kyner United States
Р. Р. Алиев Russia
Anna Ghazaryan United States
Tanya Schmah Canada
Martin Wechselberger Australia
Vladimir I. Nekorkin Russia
Claude Meunier France
Hiroki Tanabe Japan
Mathieu Desroches France
Axel Hutt France
George W. Patrick relative to W. T. Kyner United States W. T. Kyner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.0×
W. T. Kyner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George W. Patrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George W. Patrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George W. Patrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George W. Patrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George W. Patrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George W. Patrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George W. Patrick. The network helps show where George W. Patrick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside George W. Patrick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George W. Patrick Line = papers co-authored together George W. Patrick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998411
2 198276
3 199659
4 199259
5 198329
6 198128
7 199528
8 200924
9 199623
10 201521
11 200421
12 200020
13
The Improved Performance of Home Grown Timber Glulam Beams Using Fibre Reinforcement
200117
14 198716
15 198215
16 200711
17 200010
18 20158
19 19848
20 20096

About George W. Patrick

George W. Patrick is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Numerical Analysis, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Neurology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 935 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Numerical methods for differential equations (9 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (7 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers), Model Reduction and Neural Networks (5 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (4 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (4 papers), Modeling and Simulation Systems (4 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (439 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (352 citations), Neurology (142 citations), Computational Mechanics (252 citations) and Sensory Systems (38 citations). George W. Patrick has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jerrold E. Marsden, Steve Shkoller, Duane E. Haines, W. J. Anderson, Benedict Leimkuhler, Mark Roberts, Claudia Wulff, Dong Eui Chang, Tudor S. Raţiu and Darryl D. Holm. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nonlinear Science, Journal of Geometry and Physics, Developmental Neuroscience, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Journal of Morphology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact