Geoff Dean

34 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Geoff Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Political Science and International Relations 127
  • Communication 36
  • Sociology and Political Science 184
  • Information Systems 62
  • Strategy and Management 35
Replace Ian Somerville with:
Ian Somerville United Kingdom
Sara Degli Esposti Spain
Liav Orgad Israel
Tamara Shepherd Canada
Kate Klonick United States
Laura Silver United States
Delfina Soares Portugal
Mariken Anna Catharina Geertruida van der Velden Netherlands
Penelope Sheets Netherlands
Colin Agur United States
Geoff Dean relative to Ian Somerville United Kingdom Ian Somerville's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Ian Somerville · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Geoff Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geoff Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoff Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoff Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geoff Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoff Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoff Dean. The network helps show where Geoff Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Geoff Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Geoff Dean Line = papers co-authored together Geoff Dean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201627
2 200725
3 200822
4 200721
5 201020
6
The dark side of social media : review of online terrorism
201220
7 199519
8 201019
9 201018
10 200815
11 200612
12 201112
13 200812
14 201411
15 20219
16 20109
17 20108
18 20177
19 20067
20 20086

About Geoff Dean

Geoff Dean is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Information Systems and Strategy and Management, having authored 36 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (12 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (5 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (5 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (5 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (4 papers), Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence (4 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (3 papers) and Emotional Intelligence and Performance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (127 citations), Communication (36 citations), Sociology and Political Science (184 citations), Information Systems (62 citations) and Strategy and Management (35 citations). Geoff Dean has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Norway and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Petter Gottschalk, Peter Bell, Ivar Fahsing, Zarina Vakhitova, Mark Lauchs, Graeme J. Pettet, Cathrine Filstad, Morten Emil Berg, Jan Terje Karlsen and Hans Solli‐Sæther. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Police Science & Management, Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles, Policing & Society and International journal of law, crime and justice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact