Gemma Carter
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Papers in
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 2
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 1
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research 1
- Co-authors
- Tien Yin Wong (2 shared papers)Paul Mitchell (1 shared paper)Alberto Ferreira (1 shared paper)Rowena Hughes (1 shared paper)Obaro Evuarherhe (4 shared papers)Frederick Lewis Altice (1 shared paper)Anne Christine Beaubrun (1 shared paper)Jean‐François Korobelnik (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences (1 paper)BMC Ophthalmology (1 paper)Patient Preference and Adherence (1 paper)American Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Gemma Carter
5 papers receiving 750 citations
Gemma Carter's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Ophthalmology 278
- Epidemiology 336
- Infectious Diseases 138
- Family Practice 14
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 64
Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Carter
This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Carter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Carter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Carter. The network helps show where Gemma Carter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Carter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Epidemiology and Disease Burden of Pathologic Myopia and Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 583 |
| 2 | 2019 | 168 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 |
About Gemma Carter
Gemma Carter is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, History and Philosophy of Science, Infectious Diseases and Physiology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 776 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Academic Writing and Publishing (1 paper), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (1 paper), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (1 paper) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (278 citations), Epidemiology (336 citations), Infectious Diseases (138 citations), Family Practice (14 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (64 citations). Gemma Carter has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tien Yin Wong, Paul Mitchell, Alberto Ferreira, Rowena Hughes, Obaro Evuarherhe, Frederick Lewis Altice, Anne Christine Beaubrun, Jean‐François Korobelnik, James Stephen Talks and Taiji Sakamoto. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, BMC Ophthalmology, Patient Preference and Adherence and American Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.