Gedeon Gál
Impact in
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Historical Studies in Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 11
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 9
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 5
- Classics 8
- Medieval Literature and History 5
- Byzantine Studies and History 2
- Co-authors
- Rega Wood (5 shared papers)Marilyn McCord Adams (3 shared papers)Philotheus Boehner (3 shared papers)Stephen Brown (1 shared paper)Ernest A. Moody (1 shared paper)Johannes Hofer (1 shared paper)Girard J. Etzkorn (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Philosophical Review (3 papers)Franciscan studies (12 papers)Speculum (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (5 papers)
In The Last Decade
Gedeon Gál
12 papers receiving 28 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
- Classics 19
- History and Philosophy of Science 22
- Philosophy 51
- Anthropology 14
- History 13
Countries citing papers authored by Gedeon Gál
This map shows the geographic impact of Gedeon Gál's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gedeon Gál with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gedeon Gál more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gedeon Gál
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gedeon Gál. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gedeon Gál. The network helps show where Gedeon Gál may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Gedeon Gál, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1980 | 10 | |
| 2 | 1967 | 10 | |
| 3 | Lectura secunda in librum primum sententiarum | 1990 | 9 |
| 4 | 1969 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1977 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1954 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1976 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1980 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 3 | |
| 10 | Nicolaus Minorita: Chronica : documentation on Pope John XXII, Michael of Cesena and the poverty of Christ, with summaries in English : a source book | 1996 | 3 |
| 11 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1953 | 2 | |
| 13 | Guillelmi de Militona Quaestiones de sacramentis | 1961 | 1 |
| 14 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1979 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 18 | Venerabilis inceptoris Guillelmi de Ockham Summa logicae | 1997 | 0 |
| 19 | Opera dubia et spuria Venerabili inceptori Guillelmo de Ockham adscripta | 1988 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 0 |
About Gedeon Gál
Gedeon Gál is a scholar working on Philosophy, Classics, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology and History, having authored 22 papers that have together received 70 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Philosophy and Theology (9 papers), Medieval Literature and History (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers), Medieval European Literature and History (3 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Historical Studies in Science (2 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (19 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (22 citations), Philosophy (51 citations), Anthropology (14 citations) and History (13 citations). Frequent co-authors include Rega Wood, Marilyn McCord Adams, Philotheus Boehner, Stephen Brown, Ernest A. Moody, Johannes Hofer and Girard J. Etzkorn. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Franciscan studies, Speculum and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.