Gail Rees

1.8k citations
31 papers · 855 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Gail Rees

30 papers receiving 712 citations

Peers

Gail Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 182
  • Emergency Medicine 115
  • Surgery 490
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 63
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 51
Replace H. S. Chadwick with:
H. S. Chadwick United States
Jean Jacques Eledjam France
Brian K. Ross United States
Diane R. Biehl Canada
Michael G. Richardson United States
Greger Olsson Sweden
Eva Roofthooft Belgium
Gordon B. Taylor United States
Sibel Bari̇ş Türkiye
David B. Baines Australia
Gail Rees relative to H. S. Chadwick United States H. S. Chadwick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
H. S. Chadwick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gail Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gail Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gail Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail Rees. The network helps show where Gail Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Gail Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gail Rees Line = papers co-authored together Gail Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992202
2 1988121
3 198077
4 198053
5 198549
6 198843
7 196442
8 198742
9 197236
10 199032
11 198031
12 198825
13
The role of the high dependency unit in postoperative care: an update.
199021
14 198814
15 198412
16 196411
17
Post operative care: the role of the high dependency unit.
19839
18 19808
19 19776
20 19884

About Gail Rees

Gail Rees is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 31 papers that have together received 855 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (18 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Health Services Management and Policy (2 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (2 papers), Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated Phenomena (1 paper) and Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (182 citations), Emergency Medicine (115 citations), Surgery (490 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (63 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (51 citations). Gail Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include David L. Crosby, M. Harmer, JOHN N. LUNN, S. M. Lloyd, David E. Roberts, Janet Evans, SUSAN I. REVILL, J. O. ROBINSON, Stephen Allen and GEOFFREY D. PARBROOK. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anaesthesia, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey and Obstetric Anesthesia Digest.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact