Gail Rees

64 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Gail Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 284
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 143
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 256
  • Surgery 504
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 257
Replace Griselda Cooper with:
Griselda Cooper United Kingdom
Pryseley Nkouibert Assam Singapore
David Niv Israel
H. Keïta France
Jasbir Kaur India
Ju Lee Oei Australia
D. Michelet France
Constance S. Houck United States
Vicki S Barber United Kingdom
Sheri Dodd United States
Gail Rees relative to Griselda Cooper United Kingdom Griselda Cooper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Griselda Cooper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gail Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gail Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gail Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail Rees. The network helps show where Gail Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gail Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gail Rees Line = papers co-authored together Gail Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992187
2 198898
3 200871
4 198068
5 201058
6 200949
7 198047
8 198545
9 201344
10 200540
11 196438
12 198737
13 200537
14 198834
15 201333
16 199033
17 197231
18 198028
19 198822
20
The role of the high dependency unit in postoperative care: an update.
199021

About Gail Rees

Gail Rees is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (13 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (12 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (10 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (10 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (7 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (7 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (5 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (284 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (143 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (256 citations), Surgery (504 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (257 citations). Gail Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Rosen, David L. Crosby, D. G. Bogod, Michael A. Crawford, M. Harmer, Michael J. Rosen, Louise Brough, Jesse F. Gregory, Edgar K. Dorman and Chris Richards. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Anaesthesia, Nutrients and Maternal and Child Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact