G. Swift

35 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

G. Swift
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Radiation 108
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 130
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 227
  • Condensed Matter Physics 76
  • Aerospace Engineering 86
Replace H. Euteneuer with:
H. Euteneuer Germany
E. Blum United States
S. Muto Japan
H. Piekarz United States
F. R. Buskirk United States
J. W. Noé United States
R. Pitthan United States
T. Mulera United States
P. Kirk United States
N. Yu. Muchnoi Russia
G. Swift relative to H. Euteneuer Germany H. Euteneuer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
H. Euteneuer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Swift

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Swift's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Swift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Swift more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Swift

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Swift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Swift. The network helps show where G. Swift may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Swift, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Swift Line = papers co-authored together G. Swift links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001125
2 198044
3 198638
4 199928
5 197920
6 200217
7 200113
8 199012
9 200211
10 200710
11 19929
12 20029
13 19808
14 19928
15 19798
16 19816
17 20046
18 20105
19 19814
20
COMMISSIONING AND OPERATION OF WIGGLER SWITCHYARD SYSTEM FOR DUKE FEL AND HIGS
20134

About G. Swift

G. Swift is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (22 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (15 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (10 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (9 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (7 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (6 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers) and Particle Detector Development and Performance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (108 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (130 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (227 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (76 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (86 citations). G. Swift has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include R. E. Packard, J. P. Eisenstein, S. T. P. Boyd, I. Pinayev, D. S. Buchanan, S. Hartman, R. M. Prior, J. H. Kelley, K. Sabourov and H. R. Weller. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Cryogenics and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact