G. Mark Freeman

12 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

G. Mark Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 166
  • Aging 13
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 115
  • Pharmacology 83
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
Replace Lisa R. Goldberg with:
Lisa R. Goldberg United States
Craig A. Schiltz United States
Kensuke Utsunomiya Japan
János Hanics Hungary
Elena Marino Italy
Elizabeth J. Cline United States
Alier J. Franco United States
Alexander A. Moghadam United States
Vineet Augustine United States
Taina Hätönen Finland
G. Mark Freeman relative to Lisa R. Goldberg United States Lisa R. Goldberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.4×
Lisa R. Goldberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Mark Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Mark Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Mark Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Mark Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Mark Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Mark Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Mark Freeman. The network helps show where G. Mark Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Mark Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Mark Freeman Line = papers co-authored together G. Mark Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2013108
2 2005101
3 201746
4 201333
5 201729
6 201625
7 201814
8 201611
9 201110
10 201310
11 20086
12 20141

About G. Mark Freeman

G. Mark Freeman is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (6 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers), Light effects on plants (3 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (1 paper), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (1 paper) and Spaceflight effects on biology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (166 citations), Aging (13 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (115 citations), Pharmacology (83 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (11 citations). G. Mark Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Erik D. Herzog, Sara J. Aton, P.F. Thaben, Charles M. Gammon, William C. Wetsel, Sandra L. Petersen, Margo Thienemann, Jennifer Frankovich, Ellen J. Spartz and Kayla D. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, Handbook of experimental pharmacology, Journal of Neurophysiology, American Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact