G. Enderlein

1.2k citations
58 papers · 878 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

G. Enderlein

50 papers receiving 771 citations

Peers

G. Enderlein
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
  • Statistics and Probability 134
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 57
  • Software 19
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 41
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 38
Replace Dan Grove with:
Dan Grove United Kingdom
Richard J. Larsen United States
Donald R. McNeil United States
Richard R. Picard United States
Charles L. Dunn United States
C. H. Sim Malaysia
Eric Ziegel
Denis H. Ward
Alan J. Gross United States
Pieter Bastiaan Ober Netherlands
G. Enderlein relative to Dan Grove United Kingdom Dan Grove's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Dan Grove · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Enderlein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Enderlein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Enderlein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Enderlein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Enderlein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Enderlein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Enderlein. The network helps show where G. Enderlein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside G. Enderlein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Enderlein Line = papers co-authored together G. Enderlein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1968144
2 1964141
3 196579
4 197073
5 196156
6 196650
7 198839
8 199932
9 196126
10 197721
11 198719
12 199518
13 198515
14 197515
15 198714
16 198812
17 197812
18 198711
19 19689
20 19679

About G. Enderlein

G. Enderlein is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Automotive Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering and Plant Science, having authored 58 papers that have together received 878 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers), Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis (3 papers), Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control (3 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (3 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (2 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (2 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (134 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (57 citations), Software (19 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (41 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (38 citations). G. Enderlein has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Dirk Dahmann, Ralph Mücke, A. Handstein, Alyson Meister, H. Seidel, Holly Kramer, C Boewer, P. Verges, D. Eckert and B. Dwersteg. Their work appears in journals such as Biometrical Journal, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Cryogenics and IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact