G E Mead

661 citations
13 papers · 305 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

G E Mead

11 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

G E Mead
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Neurology 77
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 104
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 66
  • Rehabilitation 19
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 59
Replace Thomas Wolfe with:
Thomas Wolfe United States
Anna Krützelmann Germany
A. Reccius Chile
Jeffrey D. Chien United States
Paul Fu United States
Matthew Siket United States
Thierry Crépin-Leblond France
Guven Uzun United States
Gregory Telman Israel
Iszet Campo‐Bustillo United States
G E Mead relative to Thomas Wolfe United States Thomas Wolfe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Thomas Wolfe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G E Mead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G E Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G E Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G E Mead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G E Mead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G E Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G E Mead. The network helps show where G E Mead may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside G E Mead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G E Mead Line = papers co-authored together G E Mead links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2000124
2 199471
3 200036
4 199527
5 199913
6 200812
7 20029
8 19998
9 19963
10
Interventions for post-stroke fatigue: A systematic review and meta-analysis
20151
11
Pharmacological cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and flutter.
20061
12 19960
13 20070

About G E Mead

G E Mead is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 13 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (3 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (2 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (2 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (1 paper) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (77 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (104 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (66 citations), Rehabilitation (19 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (59 citations). G E Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Charles McCollum, A.J. Mortimer, Anne Farrell, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Scott Ramsay, Martin Dennis, Alessia M. Lardi, A Pollock, Michael Sharpe and Ho-Yan Yvonne Chun. Their work appears in journals such as Age and Ageing, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, European Journal of Ultrasound, Anaesthesia and Journal of Vascular Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact