G. de Wit

537 citations
11 papers · 315 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

G. de Wit

8 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

G. de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Neurology 178
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 68
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 102
  • Sensory Systems 24
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 34
Replace Takashi Tokita with:
Takashi Tokita Japan
G. Cl�ment France
F.A.M. OTTENHOFF Netherlands
Mikhail Kunin United States
Tateo Warabi Japan
J. H. J. Allum Switzerland
J. Kasper United States
Alexandra Séverac Cauquil France
Michel Toupet France
Claire C. Gianna United Kingdom
G. de Wit relative to Takashi Tokita Japan Takashi Tokita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Takashi Tokita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. de Wit. The network helps show where G. de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside G. de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. de Wit Line = papers co-authored together G. de Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1984120
2 197291
3 198357
4
Seasickness; (motion sickness) a labyrinthological study.
195320
5
Study of the effects of optic stimuli on standing.
197613
6 19986
7 19574
8 19882
9
A stabilographic study of the role of optic stimuli in maintaining the postural position in patients suffering from postconcussional dizziness.
19752
10 20100
11 20150

About G. de Wit

G. de Wit is a scholar working on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 11 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (4 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Color perception and design (1 paper), Photography and Visual Culture (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper) and Urban and spatial planning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (178 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (68 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (102 citations), Sensory Systems (24 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (34 citations). G. de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Willem Bles, T. S. Kapteyn, J.M.B.V. de Jong and J.E. Bos. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Oto-Laryngologica, ORL, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology, Brain Research Bulletin and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact